Archive for February, 2010

 

Happy to pay into a Single Payer system

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Karen Klotz, Hardwick

My husband and I are currently spending $179.00/month to purchase health insurance through my employer and still have to pay a $4,000 deductible before anything is paid for. Because of this we never go to the doctor for preventative care because we know we will have to pay for it. If we had a single payer system that covered preventative care it would save money in the long-run, as people would get the care they needed when they needed it. I would be happy to pay into the single-payer system (and hopefully my employer could put the money they spend on my insurance toward it too) to actually have my care paid for without having to meet a high deductible. Please help us to achieve the single payer system in Vermont.

Read the rest of this entry »

We Can’t Afford This!

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Denise Parker, White River Junction

My husband and I were on Medicade for many years when he was in school and worked part time. I can not work because I have an auto-immune disease. Now that he is out of school he can not find a job in his field due to the economy. We live on one paycheck making 25 dollars to much for medicaid. They put us on Green Mtn. Care and must pay deductibles, for each script. for each Dr. visit and 20% of blood tests, etc. That 25 dollars is eaten up with 1 doctor visit and 1 script. I take 6 scripts a day and see the doctor every 2 months. That doesn’t include my regular doctor and my husband. We cant pay all these out of pocket bills. We need single payer and we understand we will all have to pay a little more in taxes for this. We cant afford not to. Thank you for your time and God Bless.

Read the rest of this entry »

Universal Coverage Would Mean…

Friday, February 26th, 2010

By: Marge Power, VT for Single Payer Supporter, Montpelier
Everybody is in favor of universal health care. Sure they are just ask them. But did you know that there seems to be a problem defining “universal”. Say what? That’s right. It seems that some of our legislators can’t understand simple English.
On February 2, [...]

Read the rest of this entry »

Middle Class Most Adversely Affected by Current System

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Jess Wagener, ER Doctor, Middlebury

I am an emergency room physician in Middlebury. In my practice I see every day the effect our irrational and unequal system has on ordinary people. The people I see who are most adversely affected by the current system are middle class – farmers and small business owners who don’t work for the state or a large corporation. These people have access only to expensive private insurance plans with high deductibles. They delay seeking regular care or treatment for minor problems, allowing small problems to become big ones. They don’t have prescription plans and can’t afford the price of medication that they need.

For these families, even a minor illness or injury can push them over the edge into financial ruin. It is very sad to tell a patient that they need an X-Ray or CT scan only to be told – Doctor I just can’t afford it. I’m still paying off medical expenses from a previous illness. These are hardworking members of our community

Read the rest of this entry »

Private Insurance Profits by Limiting Access

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Nancy Welch, Professor, Burlington

When my husband was diagnosed with tumors in both kidneys and his brain, our health insurance provider assigned us a case worker–not to help us coordinate his care but instead to restrict his access to care. Each time he needed to see a specialist, each time a doctor ordered a test or a radiation treatment, we had to contact the case worker who would later inform us that our request had been denied. We then had to appeal and wait critical days and weeks before each request was finally approved. The tumors in my husband’s kidneys were on the verge of metastasis; the brain tumor threatened the vision in his only eye. The practice that private insurance must pursue if it is to squeeze a profit from health care–the practice of limiting access or discouraging use of benefits–was aimed at

Read the rest of this entry »

Insurance Tied to Employment with No Safety Net is Worrisome

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Ellen Powell, South Burlington

I am keeping fingers and toes crossed for single Payer in VT because I live on the edge of poverty and my health insurance relies on how many college students sign up for bass lessons at SUNY Plattsburgh each semester. If I don’t get enough, I don’t get health insurance. At the end of each semester I bite my nails, wondering if I’m going to get enough students signed up for the next semester to qualify for their health insurance for a few more months. It’s been like this for three years, is nerve wracking and it sucks. If there was a safety net under me of single payer in VT I would

Read the rest of this entry »

What is an ACO?

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

By, Dr. Deborah Richter, Vermont for Single Payer Supporter

Legislators desperate to avoid addressing single payer have seized on a save-the-day concept. These are called ACOs, which stands for Accountable Care Organizations. What exactly are they? No need to ask your legislators because none will be able to explain ACOs in under 15 minutes or 10,000 words, if at all

ACOs propose to collect doctors, medical personnel and hospitals into regional groups.These groups, or organizations, receive a lump sum payment (from where? you may want to ask.) to care for patients (who volunteer or are assigned? you’ll want to ask).

Where it gets interesting is here: the operating assumption is that Vermont doctors – who deliver some of the best health care in the country according to national rating groups – are motivated above all by money. This being so, goes the theory, it is time to apply the old carrot and the stick. Both carrot and stick are money.

Read the rest of this entry »

Catamount Health Costs

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

By: Marge Power, VT for Single Payer Supporter, Montpelier
Catamount Health is a State health care insurance program that helps eligible Vermonters buy health insurance from private insurance companies, Blue Cross/Blue Shield and MVP. Why would the State pay private insurance companies when it has the capacity to administer the program directly? [...]

Read the rest of this entry »

Vermont Could Become the Leader in Reform

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Paul Martin, South Burlington

As a Canadian now living in Vermont, I’ve lived for most of my life with a single payer system and have seen first-hand how much more efficient it can be. More important than anything, though, is how much better it would be for the day-to-day life of Vermonters. Imagine being able to switch jobs, create your own business, hire an employee, or raise children without ever having to think twice about whether you will have access to healthcare. This is the reality for everyone in every other major country in the world. Economically, this would be a huge boost to the Vermont economy and would be phenomenal for business. What business would not want to move to Vermont if their cost of providing healthcare was dropped dramatically. Imagine how much more we could achieve this way! This would raise both the standard of living and the quality of life in Vermont.

If you’re looking for examples of how Vermont could become the leader in the US for reform, look no further than

Read the rest of this entry »

Experts Testify: Millions can be saved in administrative costs

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

By: Dr. Deborah Richter
The Senate Health committee took testimony this week from two national experts on the subject of administrative costs in health care with particular emphasis on hospital administrative costs.
Dr. Himmelstein is a researcher and physician from  Harvard University.  
Dr Kahn is from University of California San Francisco.
Dr. Himelstein reported that 26% of hospital [...]

Read the rest of this entry »